In Search of Cosmic
Origins The Great Saga of the Universe
Joseph Mathew
Asian Trading Corporation
Bangalore,
2014, pp. 321 + xvii,
Price: 280/-
ISBN 978-81-7086-693-0.
josephmathewa@gmail.com
frjosephmathews@gmail.com
The
recently published book In Search of Cosmic Origins: The Great Saga of the
Universe by Dr. Joseph Mathew is a unique contribution to scientific cosmology and
philosophical theology. What makes it different from other books of this class
is the erudite philosophical basis on which it is developed, the comprehensive
and precise scientific cosmological information it provides, and the
philosophical theology it proposes. This book can be read, understood, enjoyed
and pondered over with aroused intellectual curiosity by lay readers as well as
professional physicists alike without unbearable mental strain that any serious
work on scientific cosmology and philosophical theology usually exerts on
readers.
The title of the book In Search of Cosmic Origins and its
subtitle The Great Saga of the Universe
highlight its central concerns. It is divided into three parts: “A History of
the Search for Cosmic Origins,” “The Saga of the Universe,” and “In Search of
Cosmic Foundations.” The prologue introduces the subject matter of the book—the
universe which is the greatest and most majestic object we can ever imagine or
think of. The first part deals with mythical, philosophical and scientific
search for origins and is, for the most part, historical and epistemological.
The presentations of Aristotle’s physics, Newtonian mechanics, Einstein’s
theory of relativity and quantum theory provides the reader rare insights into
what these scientific ‘paradigms’ are all about, and ‘paradigm shifts’ from
Aristotle to Newton and from Newton to Einstein are analyzed thoroughly. The
last chapter of the first part proposes a comprehensive concept of the
universe, explained with the help of a diagram.
The second part is in fact the
main body of the book; it is an extensive and interesting narration of modern
theories about the origin and fate of the universe and of the cosmic structures
contained therein. By the same token, the sheer magnitude and the colossal
dimensions of these gigantic and majestic objects are described in all their
splendour and glory. Reading through the author’s presentations of the Big Bang
theory, Inflationary theory, ‘Big Fizz’ theory, and hypotheses about the fate
of the universe, and of the origin and evolution of galaxies, stars, black
holes, quasars, solar system, the earth, and finally man, the lay reader would
simply wonder if his/her grasping capacity has undergone a radical
transformation. For, complex theories of scientific cosmology about the
universe and the cosmic objects are explained in such a simple language and logical
clarity without losing anything essential in them.
The third part would be of
special interest to students of philosophical theology. An exclusively
scientific search into the origins has in fact ended up with the ‘God’
question. Only intellectual honesty can account for it. Not only the author,
but no man with intellectual honesty can evade the God question while engaging
in scientific cosmology. Thus for instance, the non-theist cosmologist Stephen
Hawking concludes his work A Brief History of Time referring to the
‘mind of God.’ He says that if we discover a complete theory of physics, “[t]hen
we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take
part in the discussion of the question why it is that we and the universe
exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human
reason -- for then we should know the mind of God.”[1]
Indeed, the description of miraculous ‘cosmic coincidences’ and ‘fine tuning’ in
the third part of the book, invites readers to reflect on the ‘mind of God’
revealed in creation.
Finally, the epilogue of the book
reflects on the existential attitudes of great physicists and cosmologists towards
the universe. This is designated ‘first-person science.’ The author concludes
his book In Search of Cosmic Origins affirming
the religious attitudes towards the universe—attitudes of meaning, hope and
trust—which generate in us sentiments of gratitude and thanksgiving.
Technical terms in physics and cosmology are
all explained profusely in end note references. The map of the universe (60 x
50 cm) attached to the end of the book is a real novelty. A lay man in
cosmology can get an easy pictorial impression at a glance about the universe
and important cosmic structures in it.
Pope Francis on 27th
October 2014, addressing the Pontifical Academy of Sciences referred to
creation and evolution. “When we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the
risk of imagining God as a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything.
But that is not so. . . . The Big Bang, which today we hold to be the origin of
the world, does not contradict the intervention of the divine creator but,
rather, requires it. . . . Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the
notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that
evolve.”[2]
The Pope’s remarks imply that Christian theology is slowly discovering the
peculiarity of its language which is in no way incompatible with scientific
language. In fact, ‘myth-philosophy-science’ is the sequence of historical
evolution in human thinking. The first part of In Search of Cosmic Origins brings out this historical sequence in
man’s thought. God making universe in six days and resting on the seventh day
is a wonderful mythical story giving us the message that the world utterly
depends on God. However, as Pope Francis rightly implies, myth is to be
complimented by cosmological theories such as the Big Bang theory which is described
comprehensively in the second part of the book. The third part of the book builds
on the cosmological data presented in the second part, highlighting the role of
the Cosmic Designer. It is in fact propitious that In Search of Cosmic Origins has appeared at a time when controversies
rage over the remarks of the Pope on creation and evolution. Hopefully, this
book would help to clarify the questions Pope Francis’ references have alluded
to.
A few critical remarks about the
book are in place. The author seems to make an overuse of the Aristotelian
concept of teleology when he concludes from the phenomena of cosmic
coincidences that the universe is designed for man. This conclusion is
questionable for two reasons. First, it is too anthropocentric. The rarest
possibility of life emerging on account of the ‘fine-turning’ of the universe
accounts only for life in general, not for human life in particular. It is not
justifiable to say that the emergence of human life is the final goal of cosmic
coincidences. One must not forget the fact that man is just one species of living
beings (and that too, is of very later origin, and that, according to many
biologists, has not yet completed the evolutionary cycle). Second, if man is
the supposed goal of cosmic evolution, how can we explain the future existence
of the universe without human beings for billions of years, as the author
himself admits? (cf. p. 205)
In the third part of In Search of Cosmic Origins, the author attempts
to establish the existence of God from intelligent design of the universe. Here
God is considered as the ‘Master Mind’ in the universe. Isn’t the Intelligent
Designer a ‘God of the gaps’? Such an argument for the existence of God does
not seem to fill the gap left by scientific theories since the mystery of God
always leaves a gap. Dietrich Bonhoeffer has warned us about this sort of conclusions.
“If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further
back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with
them, and is therefore continually in retreat.”[3]
However, the author offers quite a novel opening for dialogue between cosmology
and theology by proposing the concept of ‘first-person science’ in the epilogue.
(pp. 249-59) This concept could be developed as a bridge between science and religion.
Finally, the author acknowledges
that there is a re-assurance of meaning and hope for humanity in the
completeness of ‘cosmos-anthropos-theos triad.’ (p. 256) But what is the
basis of this hope? In the second part of the book “the Saga of the Universe,” we
read referring to the fate of the universe: “[F]inally there is the ‘universal’
catastrophe -- the end of the universe. Regarding the ultimate fate of the
universe, we [can see] four different possible scenarios: the Big Freeze, the
Big Crunch, the Big Rip, and the Big Decay. . . . [In any case,] whatever
begins to exist will come to an end. This is true of human life as well as of
the universe.” (p. 207) If that be the case, what is there to be hopeful about for
us human beings, even if there is an Intelligent Cosmic Designer behind all
these? Isn’t our hope a ‘hope against hope’?
Even when we pose some critical
questions about the book, this in no way tells upon its scholarly value. The Great Saga of the Universe is in
fact a great story that can be read with investigative curiosity and literary
ease. The book is written in a narrative style from prologue to epilogue, and it
reads like a true story. The language of the book is simple and clear, and the
logical flow of the text is impeccable. The expositions of complex theories,
one after the other -Newtonian mechanics, Einstein’s theory of relativity,
quantum physics, quantum theory of gravity, quantum cosmology, Big Bang theory,
Inflationary theory, and hypotheses about cosmic structures- all provide us
with up-to-date and comprehensive knowledge of contemporary physics and
cosmology. The book displays also the expertise of the author as a
professor of philosophy and of cosmology in particular, and as a critical
reader of the history of science. This is indeed a book which anyone interested
to know about the universe must procure and read with delight. This book will
definitely be an asset to students and professors of physics and cosmology as
well as to those working on philosophical theology.
[2] http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/11/03/pope-declares-evolution-big-bang-theory-are-real-that-god-isnt-a-magician/,
accessed on 10th Nov. 2014.
[3] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison,
trans., Reginald H. Fuller, 1970, pp. 310–312.
1 comment:
Good book...!
Post a Comment